chore: re-organize labels for better triage results (#819)

* chore: re-organize labels for better triage results

* fix: lint issue

* fix: rename gemini to qwen, remove google auth hint

* fix: remove scripts
This commit is contained in:
Mingholy
2025-10-17 19:49:11 +08:00
committed by GitHub
parent 9d664623f5
commit 096fabb5d6
6 changed files with 318 additions and 111 deletions

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
name: 'Bug Report' name: 'Bug Report'
description: 'Report a bug to help us improve Qwen Code' description: 'Report a bug to help us improve Qwen Code'
labels: ['kind/bug', 'status/need-triage'] labels: ['type/bug', 'status/needs-triage']
body: body:
- type: 'markdown' - type: 'markdown'
attributes: attributes:

View File

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
name: 'Feature Request' name: 'Feature Request'
description: 'Suggest an idea for this project' description: 'Suggest an idea for this project'
labels: labels:
- 'kind/enhancement' - 'type/feature-request'
- 'status/need-triage' - 'status/needs-triage'
body: body:
- type: 'markdown' - type: 'markdown'
attributes: attributes:

View File

@@ -40,21 +40,13 @@ process_pr() {
fi fi
if [[ -z "${ISSUE_NUMBER}" ]]; then if [[ -z "${ISSUE_NUMBER}" ]]; then
echo " No linked issue found for PR #${PR_NUMBER}, adding status/need-issue label" echo " No linked issue found for PR #${PR_NUMBER} - this is acceptable for independent contributions"
if ! gh pr edit "${PR_NUMBER}" --repo "${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}" --add-label "status/need-issue" 2>/dev/null; then # We no longer require PRs to have linked issues
echo " ⚠️ Failed to add label (may already exist or have permission issues)" # Independent valuable contributions are encouraged
fi
# Add PR number to the list
if [[ -z "${PRS_NEEDING_COMMENT}" ]]; then
PRS_NEEDING_COMMENT="${PR_NUMBER}"
else
PRS_NEEDING_COMMENT="${PRS_NEEDING_COMMENT},${PR_NUMBER}"
fi
echo "needs_comment=true" >> "${GITHUB_OUTPUT}"
else else
echo "🔗 Found linked issue #${ISSUE_NUMBER}" echo "🔗 Found linked issue #${ISSUE_NUMBER}"
# Remove status/need-issue label if present # Remove status/need-issue label if present (legacy cleanup)
if ! gh pr edit "${PR_NUMBER}" --repo "${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}" --remove-label "status/need-issue" 2>/dev/null; then if ! gh pr edit "${PR_NUMBER}" --repo "${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}" --remove-label "status/need-issue" 2>/dev/null; then
echo " status/need-issue label not present or could not be removed" echo " status/need-issue label not present or could not be removed"
fi fi
@@ -99,7 +91,7 @@ process_pr() {
local LABELS_TO_REMOVE="" local LABELS_TO_REMOVE=""
for label in "${PR_LABEL_ARRAY[@]}"; do for label in "${PR_LABEL_ARRAY[@]}"; do
if [[ -n "${label}" ]] && [[ " ${ISSUE_LABEL_ARRAY[*]} " != *" ${label} "* ]]; then if [[ -n "${label}" ]] && [[ " ${ISSUE_LABEL_ARRAY[*]} " != *" ${label} "* ]]; then
# Don't remove status/need-issue since we already handled it # Don't remove status/need-issue since we already handled it (legacy cleanup)
if [[ "${label}" != "status/need-issue" ]]; then if [[ "${label}" != "status/need-issue" ]]; then
if [[ -z "${LABELS_TO_REMOVE}" ]]; then if [[ -z "${LABELS_TO_REMOVE}" ]]; then
LABELS_TO_REMOVE="${label}" LABELS_TO_REMOVE="${label}"

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
name: 'Check Issue Completeness'
on:
issues:
types:
- 'opened'
- 'edited'
permissions:
contents: 'read'
issues: 'write'
jobs:
check-issue-info:
timeout-minutes: 2
if: |-
${{ github.repository == 'QwenLM/qwen-code' && contains(github.event.issue.labels.*.name, 'type/bug') }}
runs-on: 'ubuntu-latest'
steps:
- name: 'Check for Client Information'
id: 'check_info'
env:
ISSUE_BODY: '${{ github.event.issue.body }}'
run: |-
echo "Checking issue body for required information..."
# Convert issue body to lowercase for case-insensitive matching
ISSUE_BODY_LOWER=$(echo "$ISSUE_BODY" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]')
# Initialize flags
HAS_VERSION=false
HAS_OS_INFO=false
HAS_AUTH_METHOD=false
HAS_ABOUT_OUTPUT=false
MISSING_INFO=()
# Check for /about command output by looking for its characteristic fields
# The /about output contains: CLI Version, Git Commit, Model, Sandbox, OS, Auth Method
if echo "$ISSUE_BODY_LOWER" | grep -qE 'cli version.*[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+'; then
HAS_ABOUT_OUTPUT=true
HAS_VERSION=true
fi
# If full /about output is not detected, check individual components
if [ "$HAS_ABOUT_OUTPUT" = false ]; then
# Check for version information (various formats)
if echo "$ISSUE_BODY_LOWER" | grep -qE '(cli version|version|v)[[:space:]]*[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+'; then
HAS_VERSION=true
fi
# Check for OS information
if echo "$ISSUE_BODY_LOWER" | grep -qE '(^os[[:space:]]|macos|windows|linux|ubuntu|debian|fedora|arch|darwin|win32|platform)'; then
HAS_OS_INFO=true
fi
# Check for Auth Method information
if echo "$ISSUE_BODY_LOWER" | grep -qE '(auth method|authentication|login|qwen-oauth|api.?config|oauth)'; then
HAS_AUTH_METHOD=true
fi
else
# If /about output is present, assume it contains OS and auth info
HAS_OS_INFO=true
HAS_AUTH_METHOD=true
fi
# Determine what's missing
if [ "$HAS_ABOUT_OUTPUT" = false ]; then
if [ "$HAS_VERSION" = false ]; then
MISSING_INFO+=("Qwen Code version")
fi
if [ "$HAS_OS_INFO" = false ]; then
MISSING_INFO+=("operating system information")
fi
if [ "$HAS_AUTH_METHOD" = false ]; then
MISSING_INFO+=("authentication/login method")
fi
# Suggest providing /about output for completeness
if [ "$HAS_VERSION" = false ] || [ "$HAS_OS_INFO" = false ] || [ "$HAS_AUTH_METHOD" = false ]; then
MISSING_INFO+=("full output of the \`/about\` command (recommended)")
fi
fi
# Set output variables
if [ ${#MISSING_INFO[@]} -eq 0 ]; then
echo "info_complete=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "All required information is present."
else
echo "info_complete=false" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
# Join array elements with comma
MISSING_LIST=$(IFS=','; echo "${MISSING_INFO[*]}")
echo "missing_info=$MISSING_LIST" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "Missing information: $MISSING_LIST"
fi
- name: 'Comment on Issue if Information is Missing'
if: |-
${{ steps.check_info.outputs.info_complete == 'false' }}
uses: 'actions/github-script@60a0d83039c74a4aee543508d2ffcb1c3799cdea' # ratchet:actions/github-script@v7
env:
MISSING_INFO: '${{ steps.check_info.outputs.missing_info }}'
with:
github-token: '${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}'
script: |
const missingInfo = process.env.MISSING_INFO.split(',');
const missingList = missingInfo.map(item => `- ${item}`).join('\n');
const comments = await github.rest.issues.listComments({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: context.issue.number,
});
const botComment = comments.data.find(comment =>
comment.user.type === 'Bot' &&
comment.body.includes('Missing Required Information')
);
const commentBody = `### ⚠️ Missing Required Information
Thank you for reporting this issue! To help us investigate and resolve this problem more effectively, we need some additional information:
${missingList}
### How to provide this information:
Please run the following command and paste the complete output:
\`\`\`bash
qwen
# Then in the interactive CLI, run:
/about
\`\`\`
The output should look like:
\`\`\`
CLI Version 0.0.14
Git Commit 9a0cb64a
Model coder-model
Sandbox no sandbox
OS darwin
Auth Method qwen-oauth
\`\`\`
Once you provide this information, we'll be able to assist you better. Thank you! 🙏`;
if (botComment) {
await github.rest.issues.updateComment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
comment_id: botComment.id,
body: commentBody
});
console.log('Updated existing comment about missing information.');
} else {
await github.rest.issues.createComment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: context.issue.number,
body: commentBody
});
console.log('Created new comment about missing information.');
}
- name: 'Add status/need-information Label'
if: |-
${{ steps.check_info.outputs.info_complete == 'false' }}
uses: 'actions/github-script@60a0d83039c74a4aee543508d2ffcb1c3799cdea' # ratchet:actions/github-script@v7
with:
github-token: '${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}'
script: |
await github.rest.issues.addLabels({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: context.issue.number,
labels: ['status/need-information']
});
console.log('Added status/need-information label.');
- name: 'Remove status/need-information Label if Complete'
if: |-
${{ steps.check_info.outputs.info_complete == 'true' }}
uses: 'actions/github-script@60a0d83039c74a4aee543508d2ffcb1c3799cdea' # ratchet:actions/github-script@v7
continue-on-error: true
with:
github-token: '${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}'
script: |
try {
await github.rest.issues.removeLabel({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: context.issue.number,
name: 'status/need-information'
});
console.log('Removed status/need-information label as information is now complete.');
} catch (error) {
if (error.status === 404) {
console.log('Label not found on issue, nothing to remove.');
} else {
throw error;
}
}

View File

@@ -71,20 +71,20 @@ jobs:
1. Run: `gh label list --repo ${{ github.repository }} --limit 100` to get all available labels. 1. Run: `gh label list --repo ${{ github.repository }} --limit 100` to get all available labels.
2. Use shell command `echo` to check the issue title and body provided in the environment variables: "${ISSUE_TITLE}" and "${ISSUE_BODY}". 2. Use shell command `echo` to check the issue title and body provided in the environment variables: "${ISSUE_TITLE}" and "${ISSUE_BODY}".
3. Ignore any existing priorities or tags on the issue. Just report your findings. 3. Ignore any existing priorities or tags on the issue. Just report your findings.
4. Select the most relevant labels from the existing labels, focusing on kind/*, area/*, sub-area/* and priority/*. For area/* and kind/* limit yourself to only the single most applicable label in each case. 4. Select the most relevant labels from the existing labels, focusing on type/*, category/*, scope/*, status/* and priority/*. For category/* and type/* limit yourself to only the single most applicable label in each case.
6. Apply the selected labels to this issue using: `gh issue edit ${{ github.event.issue.number }} --repo ${{ github.repository }} --add-label "label1,label2"`. 6. Apply the selected labels to this issue using: `gh issue edit ${{ github.event.issue.number }} --repo ${{ github.repository }} --add-label "label1,label2"`.
7. For each issue please check if CLI version is present, this is usually in the output of the /about command and will look like 0.1.5 for anything more than 6 versions older than the most recent should add the status/need-retesting label. 7. For each issue please check if CLI version is present, this is usually in the output of the /about command and will look like 0.1.5 for anything more than 6 versions older than the most recent should add the status/need-retesting label.
8. If you see that the issue doesn't look like it has sufficient information recommend the status/need-information label. 8. If you see that the issue doesn't look like it has sufficient information recommend the status/need-information label.
9. Use Area definitions mentioned below to help you narrow down issues. 9. Use Category and Scope definitions mentioned below to help you narrow down issues.
## Guidelines ## Guidelines
- Only use labels that already exist in the repository - Only use labels that already exist in the repository
- Do not add comments or modify the issue content - Do not add comments or modify the issue content
- Triage only the current issue - Triage only the current issue
- Identify only one area/ label - Identify only one category/ label
- Identify only one kind/ label - Identify only one type/ label
- Identify all applicable sub-area/* and priority/* labels based on the issue content. It's ok to have multiple of these - Identify all applicable scope/*, status/* and priority/* labels based on the issue content. It's ok to have multiple of these
- Once you categorize the issue if it needs information bump down the priority by 1 eg.. a p0 would become a p1 a p1 would become a p2. P2 and P3 can stay as is in this scenario - Once you categorize the issue if it needs information bump down the priority by 1 eg.. a p0 would become a p1 a p1 would become a p2. P2 and P3 can stay as is in this scenario
- Reference all shell variables as "${VAR}" (with quotes and braces) - Reference all shell variables as "${VAR}" (with quotes and braces)
- Output only valid JSON format - Output only valid JSON format
@@ -127,45 +127,55 @@ jobs:
Things you should know: Things you should know:
- If users are talking about issues where the model gets downgraded from pro to flash then i want you to categorize that as a performance issue - If users are talking about issues where the model gets downgraded from pro to flash then i want you to categorize that as a performance issue
- This product is designed to use different models eg.. using pro, downgrading to flash etc. when users report that they dont expect the model to change those would be categorized as feature requests. - This product is designed to use different models eg.. using pro, downgrading to flash etc. when users report that they dont expect the model to change those would be categorized as feature requests.
Definition of Areas Definition of Categories and Scopes
area/ux:
- Issues concerning user-facing elements like command usability, interactive features, help docs, and perceived performance. category/cli: Command line interface and interaction
- I am seeing my screen flicker when using Gemini CLI - Issues with interactive CLI features, command parsing, keyboard shortcuts
- I am seeing the output malformed - Related scopes: scope/commands, scope/interactive, scope/non-interactive, scope/keybindings
- Theme changes aren't taking effect
- My keyboard inputs arent' being recognzied category/core: Core engine and logic
area/platform: - Issues with fundamental components, content generation, session management
- Issues related to installation, packaging, OS compatibility (Windows, macOS, Linux), and the underlying CLI framework. - Related scopes: scope/content-generation, scope/token-management, scope/session-management, scope/model-switching
area/background: Issues related to long-running background tasks, daemons, and autonomous or proactive agent features.
area/models: category/ui: User interface and display
- i am not getting a response that is reasonable or expected. this can include things like - Issues with themes, UI components, rendering, markdown display
- I am calling a tool and the tool is not performing as expected. - Related scopes: scope/themes, scope/components, scope/rendering, scope/markdown
- i am expecting a tool to be called and it is not getting called ,
- Including experience when using category/authentication: Authentication and authorization
- built-in tools (e.g., web search, code interpreter, read file, writefile, etc..), - Issues with login flows, API keys, OAuth, credential storage
- Function calling issues should be under this area - Related scopes: scope/oauth, scope/api-keys, scope/token-storage
- i am getting responses from the model that are malformed.
- Issues concerning Gemini quality of response and inference, category/tools: Tool integration and execution
- Issues talking about unnecessary token consumption. - Issues with MCP, shell execution, file operations, web search, memory, git integration
- Issues talking about Model getting stuck in a loop be watchful as this could be the root cause for issues that otherwise seem like model performance issues. - Related scopes: scope/mcp, scope/shell, scope/file-operations, scope/web-search, scope/memory, scope/git
- Memory compression
- unexpected responses, category/configuration: Configuration management
- poor quality of generated code - Issues with settings, extensions, trusted folders, sandbox configuration
area/tools: - Related scopes: scope/settings, scope/extensions, scope/trusted-folders, scope/sandbox
- These are primarily issues related to Model Context Protocol
- These are issues that mention MCP support category/integration: External integrations
- feature requests asking for support for new tools. - Issues with IDE integration, VSCode extension, Zed integration, GitHub Actions
area/core: Issues with fundamental components like command parsing, configuration management, session state, and the main API client logic. Introducing multi-modality - Related scopes: scope/ide, scope/vscode, scope/zed, scope/github-actions
area/contribution: Issues related to improving the developer contribution experience, such as CI/CD pipelines, build scripts, and test automation infrastructure.
area/authentication: Issues related to user identity, login flows, API key handling, credential storage, and access token management, unable to sign in selecting wrong authentication path etc.. category/platform: Platform compatibility
area/security-privacy: Issues concerning vulnerability patching, dependency security, data sanitization, privacy controls, and preventing unauthorized data access. - Issues with installation, OS compatibility, packaging
area/extensibility: Issues related to the plugin system, extension APIs, or making the CLI's functionality available in other applications, github actions, ide support etc.. - Related scopes: scope/installation, scope/macos, scope/windows, scope/linux, scope/packaging
area/performance: Issues focused on model performance
- Issues with running out of capacity, category/performance: Performance and optimization
- 429 errors etc.. - Issues with latency, memory usage, model performance, caching
- could also pertain to latency, - Related scopes: scope/latency, scope/memory-usage, scope/model-performance, scope/caching
- other general software performance like, memory usage, CPU consumption, and algorithmic efficiency.
- Switching models from one to the other unexpectedly. category/security: Security and privacy
- Issues with data privacy, credential security, vulnerabilities
- Related scopes: scope/data-privacy, scope/credential-security, scope/vulnerability
category/telemetry: Telemetry and analytics
- Issues with metrics collection, logging, analytics
- Related scopes: scope/metrics, scope/logging, scope/analytics
category/development: Development experience
- Issues with build system, testing, CI/CD, documentation
- Related scopes: scope/build-system, scope/testing, scope/ci-cd, scope/documentation
- name: 'Post Issue Analysis Failure Comment' - name: 'Post Issue Analysis Failure Comment'
if: |- if: |-

View File

@@ -84,16 +84,16 @@ jobs:
2. Use shell command `echo` to check environment variable for issues to triage: $ISSUES_TO_TRIAGE (JSON array of issues) 2. Use shell command `echo` to check environment variable for issues to triage: $ISSUES_TO_TRIAGE (JSON array of issues)
3. Review the issue title, body and any comments provided in the environment variables. 3. Review the issue title, body and any comments provided in the environment variables.
4. Ignore any existing priorities or tags on the issue. 4. Ignore any existing priorities or tags on the issue.
5. Select the most relevant labels from the existing labels, focusing on kind/*, area/*, sub-area/* and priority/*. 5. Select the most relevant labels from the existing labels, focusing on type/*, category/*, scope/*, status/* and priority/*.
6. Get the list of labels already on the issue using `gh issue view ISSUE_NUMBER --repo ${{ github.repository }} --json labels -t '{{range .labels}}{{.name}}{{"\n"}}{{end}}' 6. Get the list of labels already on the issue using `gh issue view ISSUE_NUMBER --repo ${{ github.repository }} --json labels -t '{{range .labels}}{{.name}}{{"\n"}}{{end}}'
7. For area/* and kind/* limit yourself to only the single most applicable label in each case. 7. For category/* and type/* limit yourself to only the single most applicable label in each case.
8. Give me a single short paragraph about why you are selecting each label in the process. use the format Issue ID: , Title, Label applied:, Label removed, ovearll explanation 8. Give me a single short paragraph about why you are selecting each label in the process. use the format Issue ID: , Title, Label applied:, Label removed, ovearll explanation
9. Parse the JSON array from step 2 and for EACH INDIVIDUAL issue, apply appropriate labels using separate commands: 9. Parse the JSON array from step 2 and for EACH INDIVIDUAL issue, apply appropriate labels using separate commands:
- `gh issue edit ISSUE_NUMBER --repo ${{ github.repository }} --add-label "label1"` - `gh issue edit ISSUE_NUMBER --repo ${{ github.repository }} --add-label "label1"`
- `gh issue edit ISSUE_NUMBER --repo ${{ github.repository }} --add-label "label2"` - `gh issue edit ISSUE_NUMBER --repo ${{ github.repository }} --add-label "label2"`
- Continue for each label separately - Continue for each label separately
- IMPORTANT: Label each issue individually, one command per issue, one label at a time if needed. - IMPORTANT: Label each issue individually, one command per issue, one label at a time if needed.
- Make sure after you apply labels there is only one area/* and one kind/* label per issue. - Make sure after you apply labels there is only one category/* and one type/* label per issue.
- To do this look for labels found in step 6 that no longer apply remove them one at a time using - To do this look for labels found in step 6 that no longer apply remove them one at a time using
- `gh issue edit ISSUE_NUMBER --repo ${{ github.repository }} --remove-label "label-name1"` - `gh issue edit ISSUE_NUMBER --repo ${{ github.repository }} --remove-label "label-name1"`
- `gh issue edit ISSUE_NUMBER --repo ${{ github.repository }} --remove-label "label-name2"` - `gh issue edit ISSUE_NUMBER --repo ${{ github.repository }} --remove-label "label-name2"`
@@ -113,9 +113,9 @@ jobs:
- Do not add comments or modify the issue content. - Do not add comments or modify the issue content.
- Do not remove labels titled help wanted or good first issue. - Do not remove labels titled help wanted or good first issue.
- Triage only the current issue. - Triage only the current issue.
- Identify only one area/ label - Identify only one category/ label
- Identify only one kind/ label (Do not apply kind/duplicate or kind/parent-issue) - Identify only one type/ label (Do not apply type/duplicate or type/parent-issue)
- Identify all applicable sub-area/* and priority/* labels based on the issue content. It's ok to have multiple of these. - Identify all applicable scope/*, status/* and priority/* labels based on the issue content. It's ok to have multiple of these.
- Once you categorize the issue if it needs information bump down the priority by 1 eg.. a p0 would become a p1 a p1 would become a p2. P2 and P3 can stay as is in this scenario. - Once you categorize the issue if it needs information bump down the priority by 1 eg.. a p0 would become a p1 a p1 would become a p2. P2 and P3 can stay as is in this scenario.
Categorization Guidelines: Categorization Guidelines:
P0: Critical / Blocker P0: Critical / Blocker
@@ -157,48 +157,52 @@ jobs:
- If users are talking about issues where the model gets downgraded from pro to flash then i want you to categorize that as a performance issue - If users are talking about issues where the model gets downgraded from pro to flash then i want you to categorize that as a performance issue
- This product is designed to use different models eg.. using pro, downgrading to flash etc. - This product is designed to use different models eg.. using pro, downgrading to flash etc.
- When users report that they dont expect the model to change those would be categorized as feature requests. - When users report that they dont expect the model to change those would be categorized as feature requests.
Definition of Areas Definition of Categories and Scopes
area/ux:
- Issues concerning user-facing elements like command usability, interactive features, help docs, and perceived performance. category/cli: Command line interface and interaction
- I am seeing my screen flicker when using Gemini CLI - Issues with interactive CLI features, command parsing, keyboard shortcuts
- I am seeing the output malformed - Related scopes: scope/commands, scope/interactive, scope/non-interactive, scope/keybindings
- Theme changes aren't taking effect
- My keyboard inputs arent' being recognzied category/core: Core engine and logic
area/platform: - Issues with fundamental components, content generation, session management
- Issues related to installation, packaging, OS compatibility (Windows, macOS, Linux), and the underlying CLI framework. - Related scopes: scope/content-generation, scope/token-management, scope/session-management, scope/model-switching
area/background: Issues related to long-running background tasks, daemons, and autonomous or proactive agent features.
area/models: category/ui: User interface and display
- i am not getting a response that is reasonable or expected. this can include things like - Issues with themes, UI components, rendering, markdown display
- I am calling a tool and the tool is not performing as expected. - Related scopes: scope/themes, scope/components, scope/rendering, scope/markdown
- i am expecting a tool to be called and it is not getting called ,
- Including experience when using category/authentication: Authentication and authorization
- built-in tools (e.g., web search, code interpreter, read file, writefile, etc..), - Issues with login flows, API keys, OAuth, credential storage
- Function calling issues should be under this area - Related scopes: scope/oauth, scope/api-keys, scope/token-storage
- i am getting responses from the model that are malformed.
- Issues concerning Gemini quality of response and inference, category/tools: Tool integration and execution
- Issues talking about unnecessary token consumption. - Issues with MCP, shell execution, file operations, web search, memory, git integration
- Issues talking about Model getting stuck in a loop be watchful as this could be the root cause for issues that otherwise seem like model performance issues. - Related scopes: scope/mcp, scope/shell, scope/file-operations, scope/web-search, scope/memory, scope/git
- Memory compression
- unexpected responses, category/configuration: Configuration management
- poor quality of generated code - Issues with settings, extensions, trusted folders, sandbox configuration
area/tools: - Related scopes: scope/settings, scope/extensions, scope/trusted-folders, scope/sandbox
- These are primarily issues related to Model Context Protocol
- These are issues that mention MCP support category/integration: External integrations
- feature requests asking for support for new tools. - Issues with IDE integration, VSCode extension, Zed integration, GitHub Actions
area/core: - Related scopes: scope/ide, scope/vscode, scope/zed, scope/github-actions
- Issues with fundamental components like command parsing, configuration management, session state, and the main API client logic. Introducing multi-modality
area/contribution: category/platform: Platform compatibility
- Issues related to improving the developer contribution experience, such as CI/CD pipelines, build scripts, and test automation infrastructure. - Issues with installation, OS compatibility, packaging
area/authentication: - Related scopes: scope/installation, scope/macos, scope/windows, scope/linux, scope/packaging
- Issues related to user identity, login flows, API key handling, credential storage, and access token management, unable to sign in selecting wrong authentication path etc..
area/security-privacy: category/performance: Performance and optimization
- Issues concerning vulnerability patching, dependency security, data sanitization, privacy controls, and preventing unauthorized data access. - Issues with latency, memory usage, model performance, caching
area/extensibility: - Related scopes: scope/latency, scope/memory-usage, scope/model-performance, scope/caching
- Issues related to the plugin system, extension APIs, or making the CLI's functionality available in other applications, github actions, ide support etc..
area/performance: category/security: Security and privacy
- Issues focused on model performance - Issues with data privacy, credential security, vulnerabilities
- Issues with running out of capacity, - Related scopes: scope/data-privacy, scope/credential-security, scope/vulnerability
- 429 errors etc..
- could also pertain to latency, category/telemetry: Telemetry and analytics
- other general software performance like, memory usage, CPU consumption, and algorithmic efficiency. - Issues with metrics collection, logging, analytics
- Switching models from one to the other unexpectedly. - Related scopes: scope/metrics, scope/logging, scope/analytics
category/development: Development experience
- Issues with build system, testing, CI/CD, documentation
- Related scopes: scope/build-system, scope/testing, scope/ci-cd, scope/documentation