abbyswag/qwen-code
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code.git synced 2025-12-20 08:47:44 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Revert "chore(cli/slashcommands): Add status enum to SlashCommandEvent telemetry" (#6161)

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Jacob Richman
2025-08-13 11:13:18 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent 38876b738f
commit e4473a9007
7 changed files with 124 additions and 218 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

136
packages/cli/src/ui/hooks/slashCommandProcessor.ts
View File

@@ -14,8 +14,7 @@ import {
GitService,
Logger,
logSlashCommand,
makeSlashCommandEvent,
SlashCommandStatus,
SlashCommandEvent,
ToolConfirmationOutcome,
} from '@google/gemini-cli-core';
import { useSessionStats } from '../contexts/SessionContext.js';
@@ -230,70 +229,76 @@ export const useSlashCommandProcessor = (
overwriteConfirmed?: boolean,
): Promise<SlashCommandProcessorResult | false> => {
setIsProcessing(true);
if (typeof rawQuery !== 'string') {
return false;
}
const trimmed = rawQuery.trim();
if (!trimmed.startsWith('/') && !trimmed.startsWith('?')) {
return false;
}
const userMessageTimestamp = Date.now();
addItem({ type: MessageType.USER, text: trimmed }, userMessageTimestamp);
const parts = trimmed.substring(1).trim().split(/\s+/);
const commandPath = parts.filter((p) => p); // The parts of the command, e.g., ['memory', 'add']
let currentCommands = commands;
let commandToExecute: SlashCommand | undefined;
let pathIndex = 0;
let hasError = false;
const canonicalPath: string[] = [];
for (const part of commandPath) {
// TODO: For better performance and architectural clarity, this two-pass
// search could be replaced. A more optimal approach would be to
// pre-compute a single lookup map in `CommandService.ts` that resolves
// all name and alias conflicts during the initial loading phase. The
// processor would then perform a single, fast lookup on that map.
// First pass: check for an exact match on the primary command name.
let foundCommand = currentCommands.find((cmd) => cmd.name === part);
// Second pass: if no primary name matches, check for an alias.
if (!foundCommand) {
foundCommand = currentCommands.find((cmd) =>
cmd.altNames?.includes(part),
);
try {
if (typeof rawQuery !== 'string') {
return false;
}
if (foundCommand) {
commandToExecute = foundCommand;
canonicalPath.push(foundCommand.name);
pathIndex++;
if (foundCommand.subCommands) {
currentCommands = foundCommand.subCommands;
const trimmed = rawQuery.trim();
if (!trimmed.startsWith('/') && !trimmed.startsWith('?')) {
return false;
}
const userMessageTimestamp = Date.now();
addItem(
{ type: MessageType.USER, text: trimmed },
userMessageTimestamp,
);
const parts = trimmed.substring(1).trim().split(/\s+/);
const commandPath = parts.filter((p) => p); // The parts of the command, e.g., ['memory', 'add']
let currentCommands = commands;
let commandToExecute: SlashCommand | undefined;
let pathIndex = 0;
const canonicalPath: string[] = [];
for (const part of commandPath) {
// TODO: For better performance and architectural clarity, this two-pass
// search could be replaced. A more optimal approach would be to
// pre-compute a single lookup map in `CommandService.ts` that resolves
// all name and alias conflicts during the initial loading phase. The
// processor would then perform a single, fast lookup on that map.
// First pass: check for an exact match on the primary command name.
let foundCommand = currentCommands.find((cmd) => cmd.name === part);
// Second pass: if no primary name matches, check for an alias.
if (!foundCommand) {
foundCommand = currentCommands.find((cmd) =>
cmd.altNames?.includes(part),
);
}
if (foundCommand) {
commandToExecute = foundCommand;
canonicalPath.push(foundCommand.name);
pathIndex++;
if (foundCommand.subCommands) {
currentCommands = foundCommand.subCommands;
} else {
break;
}
} else {
break;
}
} else {
break;
}
}
const resolvedCommandPath = canonicalPath;
const subcommand =
resolvedCommandPath.length > 1
? resolvedCommandPath.slice(1).join(' ')
: undefined;
try {
if (commandToExecute) {
const args = parts.slice(pathIndex).join(' ');
if (commandToExecute.action) {
if (config) {
const resolvedCommandPath = canonicalPath;
const event = new SlashCommandEvent(
resolvedCommandPath[0],
resolvedCommandPath.length > 1
? resolvedCommandPath.slice(1).join(' ')
: undefined,
);
logSlashCommand(config, event);
}
const fullCommandContext: CommandContext = {
...commandContext,
invocation: {
@@ -315,6 +320,7 @@ export const useSlashCommandProcessor = (
]),
};
}
const result = await commandToExecute.action(
fullCommandContext,
args,
@@ -487,18 +493,8 @@ export const useSlashCommandProcessor = (
content: `Unknown command: ${trimmed}`,
timestamp: new Date(),
});
return { type: 'handled' };
} catch (e: unknown) {
hasError = true;
if (config) {
const event = makeSlashCommandEvent({
command: resolvedCommandPath[0],
subcommand,
status: SlashCommandStatus.ERROR,
});
logSlashCommand(config, event);
}
} catch (e) {
addItem(
{
type: MessageType.ERROR,
@@ -508,14 +504,6 @@ export const useSlashCommandProcessor = (
);
return { type: 'handled' };
} finally {
if (config && resolvedCommandPath[0] && !hasError) {
const event = makeSlashCommandEvent({
command: resolvedCommandPath[0],
subcommand,
status: SlashCommandStatus.SUCCESS,
});
logSlashCommand(config, event);
}
setIsProcessing(false);
}
},