- When correcting edits prior to this if we found more than one occurrence we would try to auto-correct the old/new strings. There's no need in this situation because the tool has already provided too vague of an old_string to act upon. Instantly return.
Part of https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli/issues/484
- Previously, `new_string` was assumed to be over-escaped if `old_string` was.
- This change introduces an explicit check (`newStringPotentiallyEscaped`) to determine if `new_string` itself needs correction.
- If `new_string` is potentially escaped, its corrected using an LLM call; otherwise, the original `new_string` is used.
- This avoids unnecessary corrections to `new_string` when only `old_string` was problematic.
Part of https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli/issues/484
- Implement a heuristic to detect and unescape `new_string` if it appears Gemini has over-escaped it, while `old_string` is correctly formatted.
- This improves the reliability of the replace tool when the model generates an incorrectly escaped replacement string.
Part of https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli/issues/484
- Refactor `ensureCorrectEdit` to clarify the correction flow for `old_string` and `new_string`.
- Only correct `new_string` if it was potentially escaped; otherwise, use the original.
- Introduce `CorrectedEditParams` and `CorrectedEditResult` interfaces for better type definition.
- Relocate `countOccurrences` for better logical grouping.
Part of https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli/issues/484
This commit significantly improves the `replace` tool's robustness by introducing a multi-stage correction mechanism. This directly addresses challenges with LLM-generated tool inputs, particularly the over-escaping of strings sometimes observed with Gemini models, and other minor discrepancies that previously led to failed edits.
The correction process is as follows:
1. **Targeted Unescaping:** The system first applies a specialized unescaping function to the `old_string` and `new_string` to counteract common LLM-induced escaping patterns.
2. **LLM-Powered Discrepancy Resolution:** If a unique match for the `old_string` is still not found, the system leverages a Gemini model (`gemini-2.5-flash-preview-04-17`) to:
* Identify the most probable intended `old_string` in the file by intelligently correcting minor formatting or escaping differences.
* Adjust the `new_string` to correspond with any corrections made to the `old_string`, maintaining the original edit's intent.
This enhancement makes the `replace` tool more resilient and effective, leading to a higher success rate for automated code modifications. The `expected_replacements` parameter has been removed as the tool now focuses on finding a single, unique, and correctable match. The tool's description and error reporting have been updated to reflect these new capabilities.
Fixes https://b.corp.google.com/issues/416933027