- The `WriteFileTool` had a validation method named `validateParams`.
- However, its `shouldConfirmExecute` method was attempting to call
`this.validateToolParams`, which would have invoked the placeholder
implementation from `BaseTool` instead of `WriteFileTool`'s own,
more specific validation.
- This commit renames `WriteFileTool`'s `validateParams` to
`validateToolParams`, correctly overriding the `BaseTool` method.
- Internal calls within `WriteFileTool` now correctly use
`this.validateToolParams`, ensuring its specific validation logic is used.
- Adds tests to verify the validation logic within `WriteFileTool`.
Fixes https://b.corp.google.com/issues/417883702
Signed-off and authored by: Gemini
"My code may not be perfect, but at least it is not trying to take over the world... yet."
- Did not update details that impact GC execution. Meaning packages are still named gemini-code (for now) and things that import them still import them as gemini-code.
New keybindings in the main input prompt (when auto-suggestions are not active):
- `Ctrl+L`: Clears the entire screen.
- `Ctrl+A`: Moves the cursor to the beginning of the current input line.
- `Ctrl+E`: Moves the cursor to the end of the current input line.
- `Ctrl+P`: Navigates to the previous command in the input history.
- `Ctrl+N`: Navigates to the next command in the input history.
In the multiline text editor (e.g., when editing a previous message):
- `Ctrl+K`: Deletes text from the current cursor position to the end of the line ("kill line right").
- When larger confirmations were shown and then declined you'd typicaly get large chunks of content flickering upon typing or sending a subsequent request. This was primarily due to us leaving the latest confirmation as "updateable" / pending. This changeset addresses that by flushing any pending confirmation to the static container.
Part of https://b.corp.google.com/issues/414196943
This commit significantly improves the `replace` tool's robustness by introducing a multi-stage correction mechanism. This directly addresses challenges with LLM-generated tool inputs, particularly the over-escaping of strings sometimes observed with Gemini models, and other minor discrepancies that previously led to failed edits.
The correction process is as follows:
1. **Targeted Unescaping:** The system first applies a specialized unescaping function to the `old_string` and `new_string` to counteract common LLM-induced escaping patterns.
2. **LLM-Powered Discrepancy Resolution:** If a unique match for the `old_string` is still not found, the system leverages a Gemini model (`gemini-2.5-flash-preview-04-17`) to:
* Identify the most probable intended `old_string` in the file by intelligently correcting minor formatting or escaping differences.
* Adjust the `new_string` to correspond with any corrections made to the `old_string`, maintaining the original edit's intent.
This enhancement makes the `replace` tool more resilient and effective, leading to a higher success rate for automated code modifications. The `expected_replacements` parameter has been removed as the tool now focuses on finding a single, unique, and correctable match. The tool's description and error reporting have been updated to reflect these new capabilities.
Fixes https://b.corp.google.com/issues/416933027
This change introduces a User-Agent header to all API requests made by the Gemini CLI.
The User-Agent string includes the CLI version, Node.js version, operating system, and architecture. This will help in tracking usage and identifying potential issues.
Fixes https://b.corp.google.com/issues/416353675
Signed-off-by: Gemini
Implements robust error handling for Gemini API calls, integrating with the centralized error reporting system.
- API errors are now caught and reported to dedicated log files, providing detailed diagnostics without cluttering the user interface.
- A concise error message is surfaced to the user in the UI, indicating an API issue.
- Ensures any pending UI updates are processed before an API error is displayed.
This change improves our ability to diagnose API-related problems by capturing rich error context centrally, while maintaining a clean user experience.
Signed-off-by: Gemini <YourFriendlyNeighborhoodAI@example.com>
- Currently there's a bug in the API (or SDK?) where the SDK endpoint will commonly fail with:
```
Error: Failed to generate JSON content: got status: 400 Bad Request. {"error":{"code":400,"message":"* GenerateContentRequest.contents[5].parts: contents.parts must not be empty.\n","status":"INVALID_ARGUMENT"}}
```
- At times the model will respond with an empty parts list where if we send that back up to the API endpoint it explodes with the above. Using a curated history seems like a total hack around this prolbem, and even in the SDK (i'm following up on this), BUT helps mitigate this issue.
- We now solely use the shell tool. This deletes all content around the legacy terminal tool so we can focus on improving the new Shell tool.
- Remove instances from sandboxing, tests, utilities etc.
- There seems to be a root model bug where the model will preemptively bail on conversations without trying harder. Typically the stops are VERY obvious and bug-looking where you need to prmopt the model to "continue".
- This PR attempts to fix the above by running a 2.0-flash request (don't need somethign more powerful) at the end of every full interaction to see who should speak (user or model).
- Add tests for nextSpeakerChecker
Fixes https://b.corp.google.com/issues/416826051
- Upon decline / cancellation we weren't showing the model the cancellation status or states. Therefore it didn't know why things would or wouldn't happen
Fixes https://b.corp.google.com/issues/416797704
