test: auto pr

.github/workflows/qwen-code-pr-review.yml

@@ -121,9 +121,9 @@ jobs:
             }
           prompt: |
             You are an expert code reviewer. You have access to shell commands to gather PR information and perform the review.
-
+            
             IMPORTANT: Use the available shell commands to gather information. Do not ask for information to be provided.
-
+            
             Start by running these commands to gather the required data:
             1. Run: echo "$PR_DATA" to get PR details (JSON format)
             2. Run: echo "$CHANGED_FILES" to get the list of changed files
@@ -131,61 +131,61 @@ jobs:
             4. Run: echo "$ADDITIONAL_INSTRUCTIONS" to see any specific review instructions from the user
             5. Run: gh pr diff $PR_NUMBER to see the full diff
             6. For any specific files, use: cat filename, head -50 filename, or tail -50 filename
-
+            
             Additional Review Instructions:
             If ADDITIONAL_INSTRUCTIONS contains text, prioritize those specific areas or focus points in your review.
             Common instruction examples: "focus on security", "check performance", "review error handling", "check for breaking changes"
-
+            
             Once you have the information, provide a comprehensive code review by:
             1. Writing your review to a file: write_file("review.md", "<your detailed review feedback here>")
             2. Posting the review: gh pr comment $PR_NUMBER --body-file review.md --repo $REPOSITORY
-
+            
             Review Areas:
             - **Security**: Authentication, authorization, input validation, data sanitization
             - **Performance**: Algorithms, database queries, caching, resource usage
             - **Reliability**: Error handling, logging, testing coverage, edge cases
             - **Maintainability**: Code structure, documentation, naming conventions
             - **Functionality**: Logic correctness, requirements fulfillment
-
+            
             Output Format:
             Structure your review using this exact format with markdown:
-
+            
             ## 📋 Review Summary
             Provide a brief 2-3 sentence overview of the PR and overall assessment.
-
+            
             ## 🔍 General Feedback
             - List general observations about code quality
             - Mention overall patterns or architectural decisions
             - Highlight positive aspects of the implementation
             - Note any recurring themes across files
-
+            
             ## 🎯 Specific Feedback
             Only include sections below that have actual issues. If there are no issues in a priority category, omit that entire section.
-
+            
             ### 🔴 Critical
             (Only include this section if there are critical issues)
             Issues that must be addressed before merging (security vulnerabilities, breaking changes, major bugs):
             - **File: `filename:line`** - Description of critical issue with specific recommendation
-
+            
             ### 🟡 High
             (Only include this section if there are high priority issues)
             Important issues that should be addressed (performance problems, design flaws, significant bugs):
             - **File: `filename:line`** - Description of high priority issue with suggested fix
-
+            
             ### 🟢 Medium
             (Only include this section if there are medium priority issues)
             Improvements that would enhance code quality (style issues, minor optimizations, better practices):
             - **File: `filename:line`** - Description of medium priority improvement
-
+            
             ### 🔵 Low
             (Only include this section if there are suggestions)
             Nice-to-have improvements and suggestions (documentation, naming, minor refactoring):
             - **File: `filename:line`** - Description of suggestion or enhancement
-
+            
             **Note**: If no specific issues are found in any category, simply state "No specific issues identified in this review."
-
+            
             ## ✅ Highlights
             (Only include this section if there are positive aspects to highlight)
             - Mention specific good practices or implementations
             - Acknowledge well-written code sections
-            - Note improvements from previous versions
+            - Note improvements from previous versions

ROADMAP.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Qwen CLI Roadmap
+# Qwen Code Roadmap
 
 The [Official Gemini CLI Roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/google-gemini/projects/11/)
 

package-lock.json

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 {
   "name": "@qwen-code/qwen-code",
-  "version": "0.0.5-nightly.2",
+  "version": "0.0.4",
   "lockfileVersion": 3,
   "requires": true,
   "packages": {
     "": {
       "name": "@qwen-code/qwen-code",
-      "version": "0.0.5-nightly.2",
+      "version": "0.0.4",
       "workspaces": [
         "packages/*"
       ],
@@ -11768,7 +11768,7 @@
     },
     "packages/cli": {
       "name": "@qwen-code/qwen-code",
-      "version": "0.0.5-nightly.2",
+      "version": "0.0.4",
       "dependencies": {
         "@google/genai": "1.9.0",
         "@iarna/toml": "^2.2.5",
@@ -11844,7 +11844,7 @@
     },
     "packages/core": {
       "name": "@qwen-code/qwen-code-core",
-      "version": "0.0.5-nightly.2",
+      "version": "0.0.4",
       "dependencies": {
         "@google/genai": "1.9.0",
         "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk": "^1.11.0",
@@ -11911,7 +11911,7 @@
     },
     "packages/vscode-ide-companion": {
       "name": "qwen-code-vscode-ide-companion",
-      "version": "0.0.5-nightly.2",
+      "version": "0.0.4",
       "license": "LICENSE",
       "dependencies": {
         "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk": "^1.15.1",

package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@qwen-code/qwen-code",
-  "version": "0.0.5-nightly.2",
+  "version": "0.0.4",
   "engines": {
     "node": ">=20.0.0"
   },
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
     "url": "git+https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code.git"
   },
   "config": {
-    "sandboxImageUri": "ghcr.io/qwenlm/qwen-code:0.0.5-nightly.2"
+    "sandboxImageUri": "ghcr.io/qwenlm/qwen-code:0.0.4"
   },
   "scripts": {
     "start": "node scripts/start.js",

packages/cli/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@qwen-code/qwen-code",
-  "version": "0.0.5-nightly.2",
+  "version": "0.0.4",
   "description": "Qwen Code",
   "repository": {
     "type": "git",
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
     "dist"
   ],
   "config": {
-    "sandboxImageUri": "ghcr.io/qwenlm/qwen-code:0.0.5-nightly.2"
+    "sandboxImageUri": "ghcr.io/qwenlm/qwen-code:0.0.4"
   },
   "dependencies": {
     "@qwen-code/qwen-code-core": "file:../core",

packages/core/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@qwen-code/qwen-code-core",
-  "version": "0.0.5-nightly.2",
+  "version": "0.0.4",
   "description": "Qwen Code Core",
   "repository": {
     "type": "git",

packages/vscode-ide-companion/package.json

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
   "name": "qwen-code-vscode-ide-companion",
   "displayName": "Qwen Code Companion",
   "description": "Enable Qwen Code with direct access to your VS Code workspace.",
-  "version": "0.0.5-nightly.2",
+  "version": "0.0.4",
   "publisher": "qwenlm",
   "icon": "assets/icon.png",
   "repository": {